Эрдсийг эрдэнэст
Ирээдүйг өндөр хөгжилд
Mining The Resources
Minding the future
Tech

Disposal concepts for different nuclear waste categories

L. Nachmilner, of the Waste Technology Section in the Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology in the Department of Nuclear Energy at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna, tells E. Odjargal about the latest in the safe disposal of nuclear waste

Disposal of radioactive waste has been practised from the middle of the last century: the collected experience has resulted in developing several disposal concepts for all waste categories and their construction. The only exemption is disposal of high level waste (including spent nuclear fuel), which is not operational yet. However, viability of disposal of this waste type has been demonstrated in the number of underground research laboratories.

The current status of disposal technologies is indicated with respect to recent IAEA waste classification system. Very short lived waste is stored for decay and then cleared for disposal as non-radioactive waste. Very low level waste can be directed into surface trenches with limited engineered barrier system. Such facilities have been built in Sweden (at each nuclear power plant), France and Spain (see Fig. 1). In other countries this waste is disposed of together with low level waste.

Low level waste is typically put in near surface engineered facilities (France, Spain, Czech Republic, Slovakia – see Fig. 2), but in arid areas (South Africa, USA, Iran – see Fig. 3) it is disposed of in open trenches with limited or no isolation layers (but capping of trenches prevents water ingress into the disposal spaces). Some countries have built subsurface engineered facilities (Sweden, Finland, Norway, Czech Republic, Hungary, Korea – see Fig 4), others are developing a deep geological facility (Germany, Switzerland, Canada – see Fig. 5) for this waste category.

 There is only one operational disposal facility for intermediate level waste in the world: WIPP (USA) accepts waste contaminated by long lived nuclides from defence programmes (see Fig. 6); Japan has initiated construction of such a repository.

High level waste (and spent nuclear fuel) must be disposed of in a deep geologic formation. Intensive research performed in underground laboratories (see Fig.7) has demonstrated viability of this approach for salt (Germany, USA), granite (Switzerland, Canada, Sweden, Japan), plastic clay (Belgium), and claystone (Switzerland, France) host rocks. The first repositories are anticipated to become operational in early twenties (Sweden, Finland, France), some other countries have initiated relevant siting and investigation programmes (Germany, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Russia).


The selection of the type and number of disposal facilities depends on many aspects: national waste and spent fuel management policy and strategy, waste inventories, plans for nuclear energy exploitation, extent of the national nuclear programme. But in principle, larger programmes prefer separate facilities for particular waste categories; small programmes need just two of them for low level waste and intermediate/high level waste, or may even consider co-disposal of all waste categories in a single deep geological facility.